Needless to say, many photographers were injured and some even died attempting to use magnesium flashes. Still, there were no better options at the time, so photographers continued using the magnesium flash well into the s. All the while, researchers continued improving on the technology, making the magnesium flashes safer and working on other lighting technologies. These bulbs were created by Johannes Ostermeier and they were quite large compared to the flashes of today — roughly the size of a typical light bulb that you would use in your home.
The first bulbs were made using magnesium filaments and oxygen encased in a glass bulb. Around this same time, synchronization improved, making it much easier for photographers to produce the light when needed, during shutter actuation so that fewer shots were missed.
Over the next 30 years, bulb technology improved as well. Plastic replaced glass as containment for the bulbs since it was less likely to shatter on detonation. Eventually, zirconium replaced the magnesium because it provided a much stronger light.
One major issue remained, however: Flashes could only be used once. Detonate it and you had to replace it. The iconic Kodak Flashcube, a lighting device that almost every older photographer remembers with mixed emotions, was the next revolution in lighting technology. Today, modern cameras have inbuilt flash units.
Nombre de visiteurs Number of visitors. Story of the photographic flash. In the midth century, exposure duration was around 30 seconds.
My intention in writing Flash! Photography, Writing and Surprising Illumination was to produce a cultural history of this medium. This meant, necessarily, giving an account of its technological development — which entailed, in the first place, negotiating the shifting territory of what, precisely, I was examining. For on the one hand, I was dealing with light itself, and the unique characteristics of sudden, blinding, human-made illumination, including its effects of ocular and somatic disturbance.
On the other, I was tracing the complex history of the means used to produce this light: complex because there is no one clear narrative, but rather a good deal of overlap between similar inventions and experiments with equipment taking place simultaneously in different locations — a microcosm, indeed, of the history of photography itself. These included reflectors, and screens, and nets constructed on an old crinoline frame that would catch the smelly, smoky residue that filled the air after a tray of flash powder was exploded.
In my research and writing, it was hard, on occasion, not to get lost in the fascinating proliferations of such inventions that, from the s onwards, were increasingly reported in the columns of the specialist press; that appeared in advertisements; or that can be traced through the registration of patents. What emerged, in fact, was less a narrative of flash photography per se than a narrative of inventiveness at the hands of both professionals and amateurs — or rather, a demonstration of the blurred hinterland between these categories when it came to photographic practice and innovation.
What they shared was a continual push towards controlling the brief bursts of bright light in the interests of regularization, efficiency, safety, and the production of better images.
Flash could allow one to create a clearer, more detailed image — one that, moreover, often picked up details in an environment that were obscured or in shadow in ordinary light. Conversely, the rise of pictorial photography towards the end of the nineteenth century, at the hands of those who wished to claim an artistic rather than a pragmatic status for their activity, led to experimentation with the creative effects achieved by letting off the flash at an angle, bouncing off a wall or screen or — at a pinch — a newspaper, or from outside a curtained window —experiments in the atmospheric rather than in visual accuracy.
The work of portrait photography falls somewhere between the functional — the desire for a good likeness — and the desire to put character and individuality on display: flash could help with both.
At the same time, photographers exploited the particularly contrastive characteristics of flash — intense darkness, bright light; black and white. If these were to become especially associated with the interplay of film and photography that was to be found a few decades later in film noir, the origins of this aesthetic lie in the late Victorian recognition of the drama of flash. This drama was not merely, however, an attribute of the image, but belonged to the whole business of exploding flash powder, of breaking into darkness and frequently startling the human or animal subject.
It is this aspect of flash photography that brings it into opposition with the commonly voiced position that a photograph represents a moment snatched out of a continuum of time. By contrast, a photograph made by flash light involves a one-off burst of light, making the moment at which it is taken possess a strikingly different lighting ambience from that which preceded and followed it: flash photography is highly artificial.
This shocking interruption lends itself to sensationalism on the page, whether in fiction or journalistic prose. Its startling effects, too, provided plenty of opportunities for comedic writing. I wanted, in my book, to provide more than a chronological account of flash photography: I aimed to emphasize that like Victorian photography more broadly, flash offered an aesthetic, and a set of associations, that were readily borrowed by verbal forms.
Deliberately stretching the connotations of flash even more widely, I showed how the rapidity as well as brightness that had long been associated with the vocabulary of flash connected this technological innovation with other new forms of speediness. Flash technology was a dependent technology.
Once it was possible to fix an image on a prepared surface, people wanted to be able to take photographs under any lighting conditions, not just in bright daylight.
Although we need to consider it alongside other nineteenth-century forms of artificial brightness, including the lighting of city streets, domestic interiors, and shop windows by electricity and gas — other means of challenging darkness, that is, albeit with steadier beams — its history is inseparable from that of photography itself. It needs to be seen in relation to other factors that helped to make the taking of pictures faster and easier, from innovations in lens technology through improved properties of prepared surfaces — daguerreotypes, paper negatives, tin types, wet plates, dry plates, and film — to improvements in the portability of cameras.
By the end of the century, photographic flash signified something very rapid. But its earliest manifestations lasted for the length of time it took to make an exposure.
So far as I can tell, the first photograph taken by flash, in —40, was of a tranverse section of a madrepore, for which Captain Levett Ibbetson burned limelight for five minutes.
Limelight created, however, very crude lighting effects, and by the early s, magnesium became the favoured source of brief, bright illumination. Magnesium, though, was expensive, and here the intersection of material history with commercial developments is clearly seen. Even after its extraction and purification were greatly improved in the late s, it remained expensive — 2s 6d for a foot of wire. In , the photographic journalist, editor, writer, and photographer J.
Traill Taylor introduced his new flash powder, a mixture of powdered magnesium and an oxidizing agent, but since magnesium was still so expensive, and his compound apparently gave off a horrible smell, it was not widely adopted. During the next 20 or so years, a number of devices were introduced and demonstrated — at, for example, meetings of the British Association for the Advancement of Science — that allowed powdered magnesium to be ignited responsibly.
Usually these involved blowing it through an alcohol flame, which resulted in a brief bright flash, its duration very much dependent on the skill of the operator. The flash lamp is known for being very unsafe, and many photographers who used it were either killed or injured in the process. Around the s, flash bulbs replaced flash powder. Oxygen-filled bulbs were electricity ignited, producing a quick bright flash. However, the bulbs could only be used once, and they were often too hot to handle right after the flash.
Thirty years after the flash bulb, the cheaper and more efficient electronic flash was invented.
0コメント